Yesterday a stretch of road I regularly use was closed all day for repairs. Nothing new there and indeed the surface was badly cracked and contained many potholes of varying depth. Repairs were long overdue. As a cyclist I found the road very bad to ride along.
Having closed the whole road, in both directions you would expect the highways team to arrive, strip back the road surface, make any necessary deeper repairs and then resurface the road.
But no, it seems that some of the potholes were clearly not important enough to fix, similarly some of the cracks in the surface. What was actually done was selected areas of the road, probably between eighty and ninety percent of the surface, were stripped back and resurfaced. This left a patchwork quilt of unrepaired areas. Had these been pristine road surface then I could have understood the logic, save money perhaps, but no.
It may even not have saved any money, because I think the job would have taken less time and manpower if the whole stretch had been resurfaced rather than doing a patchwork job which then involved selectively cutting out areas.
What we are left with therefore is a road that is good in parts, but where the unrepaired areas will have to be done as a separate job. I am no expert but I also suspect that the joins may well be a weak area which could soon allow water in and start the cracking process all over again.
And just to add insult to (potential) injury, in some areas the strip either side of the centre line has been repaired but the areas where cyclists and motorbike riders will ride has been left unrepaired.
I will report back when the next round of repairs on this road is undertaken.
And our councils wonder why they are struggling financially!
Showing posts with label Cycling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cycling. Show all posts
Friday, September 2, 2011
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
The Cyclist Peril
What is it with cyclists?
Don't get me wrong, cycling can be a great way of getting around and is less polluting (though watch your increased CO2 emissions when peddling hard compared with resting!) and good exercise to boot.
Many cyclists are well behaved and follow the rules of the road, but their image is tarnished by others of their number.
My problem is with the cyclists who think they are above the law and also in many cases common sense.
In this area we have a reasonable number of cycle paths, totally separate from the road but parallel to it and within a few feet. The odd exception occurs at roundabouts as there is sometimes only one way round but all exits are served by the cycle lane. Why then do the cyclists insist on riding on the road and more to the point why do they get angry with motorists? If there was no cycle lane then of course they are entitled to use the road, but where the local council has gone to the trouble of providing one then it should be used.
There is also the issue of cyclists and their disregard for traffic lights. I thought that a red traffic light had something to do with stopping but not all cyclists seem to follow this rule. Whilst motorists are still responsible for driving carefully, they will find this more difficult if they have to dodge the cyclists running red lights, and for what - a few seconds gained on their journey? We have cyclists running red lights, dodging through pedestrian only areas and running the risks of collisions by cycling on pavements which have no cycle lane. And how many times have you seen a cyclist cut up the nearside of a line of traffic only to curse when one of the vehicles turns left (and quite probably indicating that intention!)
Recently I was out walking along a path which is for both pedestrians and cyclists and whilst not laned off is certainly wide enough. The problem there is with cyclists approaching from behind at high speed and without giving any warning (using the bell that many now see as optional despite the law) or thanking you if you move over to let a group of cyclists through. Surely common good manners will resolve this.
Whilst I am on the subject of bikes not legally equipped, there is also the issue of lighting. If out at night a cyclist is vulnerable, so why do so many either dress in dark clothes with no high-vis components, not have lights on, or both. Proper clothing and lighting would make the roads much safer for all. And by lighting I don't mean just those flashing LED lights - I believe a steady light should be shown front and rear, possibly supplemented by flashing lights to make them stand out but not solely relying on them. Surely modern LED technology should allow a good bright light with decent battery life.
Finally there is the issue of accountability and insurance. First of all there is no easy way of tracking a bike involved in an accident if it leaves the scene (we have had cases reported in the papers of people being knocked down and injured by cyclists who then ride off) and secondly they have no insurance that specifically covers cycling (some may have it on household policies or through cycle clubs) so if damage is caused, say to a vehicle, there is typically little redress for the third party. Remember these are people who may have had no training, and if not drivers may never even have read the highway code.
I am not against cyclists, I even have a bike myself which I use from time to time. I did my cycling proficiency many years ago and have forgotten most of it but I am also a driver so have an understanding of the rules of the road. I choose not to cycle at night as I don't think it is safe even with lights and high-vis but that is a personal choice. Similarly I opt for cycle lanes wherever possible even where, as with some of the lanes round here, there may be a slightly shorter road route without lanes.
Let us all try an make the roads safer whether we be cyclists or motorists.
Don't get me wrong, cycling can be a great way of getting around and is less polluting (though watch your increased CO2 emissions when peddling hard compared with resting!) and good exercise to boot.
Many cyclists are well behaved and follow the rules of the road, but their image is tarnished by others of their number.
My problem is with the cyclists who think they are above the law and also in many cases common sense.
In this area we have a reasonable number of cycle paths, totally separate from the road but parallel to it and within a few feet. The odd exception occurs at roundabouts as there is sometimes only one way round but all exits are served by the cycle lane. Why then do the cyclists insist on riding on the road and more to the point why do they get angry with motorists? If there was no cycle lane then of course they are entitled to use the road, but where the local council has gone to the trouble of providing one then it should be used.
There is also the issue of cyclists and their disregard for traffic lights. I thought that a red traffic light had something to do with stopping but not all cyclists seem to follow this rule. Whilst motorists are still responsible for driving carefully, they will find this more difficult if they have to dodge the cyclists running red lights, and for what - a few seconds gained on their journey? We have cyclists running red lights, dodging through pedestrian only areas and running the risks of collisions by cycling on pavements which have no cycle lane. And how many times have you seen a cyclist cut up the nearside of a line of traffic only to curse when one of the vehicles turns left (and quite probably indicating that intention!)
Recently I was out walking along a path which is for both pedestrians and cyclists and whilst not laned off is certainly wide enough. The problem there is with cyclists approaching from behind at high speed and without giving any warning (using the bell that many now see as optional despite the law) or thanking you if you move over to let a group of cyclists through. Surely common good manners will resolve this.
Whilst I am on the subject of bikes not legally equipped, there is also the issue of lighting. If out at night a cyclist is vulnerable, so why do so many either dress in dark clothes with no high-vis components, not have lights on, or both. Proper clothing and lighting would make the roads much safer for all. And by lighting I don't mean just those flashing LED lights - I believe a steady light should be shown front and rear, possibly supplemented by flashing lights to make them stand out but not solely relying on them. Surely modern LED technology should allow a good bright light with decent battery life.
Finally there is the issue of accountability and insurance. First of all there is no easy way of tracking a bike involved in an accident if it leaves the scene (we have had cases reported in the papers of people being knocked down and injured by cyclists who then ride off) and secondly they have no insurance that specifically covers cycling (some may have it on household policies or through cycle clubs) so if damage is caused, say to a vehicle, there is typically little redress for the third party. Remember these are people who may have had no training, and if not drivers may never even have read the highway code.
I am not against cyclists, I even have a bike myself which I use from time to time. I did my cycling proficiency many years ago and have forgotten most of it but I am also a driver so have an understanding of the rules of the road. I choose not to cycle at night as I don't think it is safe even with lights and high-vis but that is a personal choice. Similarly I opt for cycle lanes wherever possible even where, as with some of the lanes round here, there may be a slightly shorter road route without lanes.
Let us all try an make the roads safer whether we be cyclists or motorists.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)